Archive for the ‘contempt’ Category

not caring.

Thursday, September 14th, 2006

[note : the theme of this post is 'Not Caring'. i just used the blogger as an example, okays? and if you is sensitive and cries easily, don't read this post lah. unless you give me your address and i can send a packet of tissues to you as a token of appreciation] 

a friend alerted me to a certain famous blogger’s latest post. apparently that blogger was disgruntled at the lack of intellectual readers to her blog. so out of sheer boredom and mild curiousity, i went to go see what the fuss was about.

i was surprised man. for once she really made a point. she brought up the issue of steve irwin’s death and how people starting putting up tortises in their msn nicks and encouraging others to do the same.

frankly, to me, it IS sad that he died cos he left behind two young kids. but think about it. it happens to others everyday. its just that the world pays more attention to him because he was a larger-than-life celebrity whose pet cause was animal conservationism. 

for example,if a “Mr Tan Ah Soo”, an ordinary and conscientious JC tutor with 3 young kids were to die of a heart attack while teaching, would his students even care to put up perhaps ‘nerd’ icons on their msn lists and ask everybody else to do so because he was a great teacher?

i’m NOT insinuating that those who bothered to put up the tortoise emoticons were being fake. maybe you really care about irwin’s death, i may not know that.

but if you try to force your ideals on someone who doesn’t care…well… it may end up making them irritated instead of interested.

caring firstly takes a whole lot of interest to begin with. and then some. and what if you get the person interested in your ideals but it turns out screwy and he/she starts to care about crushing your ideals instead because he/she realises that he/she hates it?

not caring can sometimes make you feel better. not caring about things that aren’t of great importance, to be specific. its just like how i’ve been not-caring about the above mentioned blogger’s blog posts until the one i just mentioned. cos when her blog posts are made of fluff and such or lies, why should i care and make myself get angry?

if you don’t care about negative stuff and encourage others not to care about negative stuff too, soon everybody would ‘not care’ about the negative proponents.

and since there wouldn’t be any fuss about whatever silly things that they are trying to promote, sooner or later they would stop. now, ain’t this a great suggestion to care about? ;)

[ here's something you might wanna care about : how good your hearing is!]

staring.

Monday, August 28th, 2006

i realised i haven’t blogged here for a week. not like you care.

i apologise to my faithful 3 readers

updates on my mundane life include the fact that i’m officially part of my church’s First Aid team! thankfully they specified the requirements to only ‘Trained in First Aid’. i not yet a fully qualified SN lah. waiting for next year.

 the ministry worker in charge of hospitality pumped my hand up and down vigorously in welcome as opposed to a normal handshake. i think he’d be very good at BCLS.

(as a whim, i’m gonna post up how i look like in my NYP school uniform in my next post.maybe.)

today when i was on the bus, this lady aunty came and sat beside me on the long row of seats(double deckered bus lah). apparently her derriére was so beeg, she shoved me aside using it.again. and again. until i was forced to sit sideways+behind the bar with the stop button.

after that she kicked my foot and my slipper flew off(i was sitting cross legged).

solli ah…solli ah” was all she had to say.

i was so boiling mad inside but i kept my cool on the outside. tried to get my slipper on whilst she gave me a very ‘aiyoh why you take so long to put your slipper back on’ look.

kept staring at her after that(she was blissfully unaware) and sadly the one who got scared was the poor lady sitting opposite me with her 3 children. she looked absolutely petrified. changed my expression to a slightly more contrite one for scaring her.

(maybe i should post a picture of me staring instead and take a poll)

my intended staring victim did not get a taste of The Talented Horror that is me. how unfortunate.

G.E.M.S - My Foot Arhh!!!

Saturday, July 22nd, 2006

i’m sure singaporeans know what GEMS stands for. Go (the) Extra Mile (for) Service.

 customer service personnel are all encouraged to be nice to customers and sometimes maybe even go out of their way to meet the customer’s needs. hey, they even have some programme on tv about GEMS now(hosted by ng hui and some guy).

so here’s the scoop. i’ve been shopping around for a reasonably nice dress for my sister’s nuptials. and like most singaporeans(or maybe its just me), i dress super casually, sometimes even on the sloppy side. but sunday is my nice-dress-up day, it being the Sabbath day and showing respect to God in church and all.

ah, i’ve digressed.

so i’ve been to marina square,suntec and stamford. so as NOT to be totally insulting and obvious(also dunwanna set myself up for comprains), i shall not say which outlet i went to for every story, ok?

so let’s go to outlet A. there was only 1 salesgirl attending to the shop. just as well, there were not many customers. so it being my first time selecting dresses and with an equally blur friend, i was quite indecisive lah. the salesgirl was not helpful at all, bordering on the rude side. when i asked her for a simple dress appropriate for church weddings and said i didn’t want a white dress( only the bride can be in white mah), she snapped at me “I don’t know your taste lah! I only have these few dresses!” and she chucked a white dress at me. okaaaaye. maybe it didn’t help i was in a polo tee and denim skirt.

outlet B was no better. i was in dress sandals, jeans and t-shirt. the salespeople didn’t even look at me. i browsed through all the racks in the shop but there was nary a glance. i caught one girl staring at me ’sideways’. oh yeah. all the whilst when i was in the shop with my friends, they were busy talking to themselves. wah lau….

 outlet C was puzzling. i went inside, in polo tee and jeans, she smiled at me but stayed put at the other end of the shop. i talked in a rather loud conversational voice to my friend about how nice the dresses were, but not once did the lady show any signs of even walking towards me. her associate came out of the back to talk to her and even gestured towards me but there was still no movement on her part. hmm.

 so what? should i have gone up to them and asked for help? was it wrong of me to wait for assistance? or were they snubbing me because of my attire and age?

i don’t know, really. at first i wondered why so many singaporeans were so cynical about the GEMS and 4 million smiles campaigns. now i kinda see the light. most of us just don’t know how to ’automatically’ be nice. 

you can come and kiss my _ _ _

Thursday, May 11th, 2006

yesterday, i wrote a post that was fuelled mostly by anger at my detractor.

i comment quite abit on livejournal’s singaporean lj community. more so with politics. but i try my best not to like insult people cos its not nice and if you insult people, you can’t possibly win them over right?

so yeah, imagine how angry i got when this fella who shall not be named here insulted me, telling me that i was a liar. he even went as far to insult me on his blog(a lj friend told me about it). must give him credit for actually not writing my username there though. i don’t know. these Anti-PAP people seem pretty pissed off to me.

and all i did was telling him to try not to use vulgarities. how.funny. didn’t think it was so but now i see the light.

and hey, who cares about what some angry people think about me eh? after all, being angry doesn’t get you any where. but yeah, i will shut down my blog if he chooses to come insult me here. cos why should i give him an extra outlet to vent? my blog audience is not as big as mrbrown’s. so the online world of s’pore wouldn’t exactly mourn this blog’s demise.

till then, i shall continue. and perhaps piss off more people along the way.

very upset.

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

i don’t suppose anybody would be particularly interested in my journal entries, which is why i write pretty superficial stuff.

recently, an attack at my integrity has been made, all in the name of politics.

some fella on the Singapore Livejournal Community attacked the PAP with vulgarities. so me, being a ‘Pro-PAP piece of shit’(as what he termed people like me) just nicely told him to quit using vulgarities as it plain reeks of low-class-ness.

and he turned it into a mudslinging session at my integrity, so-called ‘digging thru my personal info’ and saying i tell lies and endorse a bully.

i don’t know, really. i read thru all my posts and they were all in my opinion rather superficial and the only time when i really got all worked up was for the MM Lee dialogue where rudeness was the crux.

what i write down here has been pretty vague, more so during the campaigning period. if anybody wants to infer further from the shallowness of my posts, they are most welcome to do so because hey, there are plenty of opinions to any issue. but do vent it in private please. i don’t recall making any personal attacks on people based on their political inclinations.

i tell you this. my 2 sisters are anti-PAP. but we never have once gotten into a heated debate with name-calling. mainly because we are just citizens that are not politically empowered. being an armchair critic is pretty puny in comparison to genuinely nice opposition people like Low and Chiam.

i’ll say this again and again : i endorse PAP not entirely, but for mostly what they can and have done. i don’t care much for the wrong things they may or may not have done because in general, 2/3 of the population agrees that they have done good stuff for them. i never ever said that i fully supported EVERYTHING they had done. i even said that they had done a GOOD job. and that every-freaking-body makes mistakes.

i do know that there have been casaulties from the PAP governance. i do not endorse suffering for i am no sadist. while i feel for those that are politically disenfranchised, i am still encouraged by the larger numbers who have been helped in one way or another by the PAP.

IF PAP was not the party that led singapore to where it was and let’s say it was the WP who had done so(and accomplished just as much) i would endorse the WP. because i endorse what has been done for the people,a.k.a reality. i do not endorse things based on dreams and ideals.

it seems like anti-PAP people don’t get where people like me are coming from. they get all angry and stuff, letting their anger cloud their judgement. they think that they have the rights to insult people like me.

to my dissenter, you have done a good job in angering me. however i am not about to resort to your kind of low. i am going to give you what you want. i will password protect all my entries that have even a tinge of politics in it. or better still, if you call for it, i can shut down my blog too, as i have once attempted doing it after some bugger that overeacted strongly to one of my posts.

oh goodness.

Saturday, April 22nd, 2006

[edited : point 6, i forgot to specify that when i said 'laptop' i meant that she prob used her laptop to write the articles on TODAY. thanks to fatboylee for bringing that point to my (short)attention(span)!] 

usually im quite reticent on this blog, not talking much about what goes on in my life(and mind, for that matter).

but somehow, when someone(or some people) talk so much about Singapore and Politics, i feel that i must retort back in a similar fashion. ARMCHAIR VERSUS ARMCHAIR! WOOOOO!!!!
those panelists(i still have yet to watch their retort session so excuse the laggard standard of writing here) steadfastly stand by their delusion that they were not rude at all. as with their supporters(who typically will be 20-30, university educated and stuff).

their supporters go one up by saying that we, the Panelists Were Rude team(PWR), focus more on their lack of respect for the MM rather than the issues brought up altogether. they also criticize us(*yawn*, whats new!) by saying that we’re like extremely closet minded and too traditional, preferring to just see MM as an ‘old man’ and that he was ‘equally rude’. and the best part is that they assume all PWR people are above the age of 30. hello! look at me please!
i don’t know what exactly other PWR people are thinking but i can offer a few possible viewpoints.(once again, excuse me if i’m blabbering and repeating myself. which also not by chance, is what one critic said MM was doing)

The Panelists Were Rude Because…

1) MM , whether or not a senior politician, the founder of the ruling party, international political figure, deserves respect because he is older and has seen and experienced more than they will ever do so in their entire life.

2) They questioned his ideas and presence in the government, hinting that he should be stepping down to like, be a proper retired man of his age. let’s refer to point 1 again. hardship to the panelists is probably like worrying if they have enough gas money or enough money to pay for their 5 star hotel wedding. or paying back their parents for what they had done. so like that, Singapore dun have to pay the PAP back for the 40 odd years lah.

3) Even if MM rambled on and had very long pauses which may have made them unsure if he was spoken, wouldn’t a simple “Excuse Me, Mr Lee” suffice? more than not, they addressed him simply as “you” rather than “mr lee”

4) they were behaving like they were politically disenfranchised. let me remind you all that the Nepalese King just yesterday annouced that he was withdrawing his earlier demand for absolute power. and that was only after his people took to the streets to protest like mad against him, causing uncessary bloodshed. in Iran, they are planning to arrest women just for wanting to look good and behaving in a very ‘un-Islamic’ way. so ah, can i ask that the panelists sell off some of their PDA mobile phones, laptops and such to provide money to champion such a worthy political cause(you know, to fight for rights, something they think Singaporeans don’t have)?

5) they clearly thought MM was not capable of fast wit and logic, being 80-ish and all. old what, surely mental capacity must have diminished somewhat. so when one particular journo was cut down to size after questioning by MM, he chose to show his innermost feelings by sulking. very mature hor?

6) Bloggers have their blogs to vent(like me!) and one journalist wielded the power of her laptop and let everybody know how foolish they(they, as in the PWR people) were in her articles on the TODAY newspaper. of course she was not being rude, she was being frank, and MM clearly WANTED this style of Q and A. of course.

7) they keep harping on how ‘things weren’t done’ and how ‘things were done wrong’. but somehow ah, talking about how ‘things got done’ is not very thought provoking. seems very useless to talk about nice things.

8) they are but greenhorns. you know, i think i would’ve actually appreciated their points coming from the mouths of members of the Opposition Party. respected people like Chiam See Tong and Low Thia Kiang. its like fans watching The Rock wrestle The Undertakeer and telling you how difficult it is to wrestle The Undertaker. Would you rather listen to how difficult it was to wrestle The Undertaker from The Rock who did wrestled him personally, or have spectators tell you what they saw?

9) they keep saying that PAP strikes fear in people and we die-die hve to support them. the way they say ah, like really must bow to MM or something. eh, we don’t have a monarchy like Thailand(do you know that before movie screeenings they show a clip about the king and the moviegoers have to bow to the king when the clip ends?) that MM is the King or something lehs. MM is merely a political leader, you are free to choose whoever you want in the government.

10) the western ideals of freedom of expression appeal more to them rather than traditional asian values of shutting up and letting your elders talk. it is also better apparently if you just barge full on regardless of what others may think.

ooh, 10 reasons! YAY ME!

i know that there’s a ban on political blogging and stuff, so prease, bear in mind that this post is NOT attacking or supporting any particular political party, okay? its just speaking out, like those panelists were doing! :D

hmmm…

Friday, April 21st, 2006

[note : this entry was blogged yesterday, on the 20th of April 2006 in the morning. i have yet to catch the panelist's retort session so forgive the outdated stuff in here] 

Inside Man

watched it yesterday. give it 4/5 stars.1 star taken off cos mainly it sure cost very little to film that movie. didn’t even recognize denzel washington until the credits were rolling. slow, i am. denzel proves his worth as an intense actor, clive owen was really good as the bank robber…and james ransome was in the movie too! for those of you who don’t know who james ransome is…its okay. i didn’t know who he was until recently. but anyway not long ago, he ran after a potential rapist and totally whupped his ass! awesome!!!

sigh..
school has started again. don’t ask me why but let’s just say my school is indeed quite screwed sometimes when it comes to administrative affairs.

i posted a comment on the MM Lee Dialogue thingy in a livejournal community and was promptly shot down by another commenter. which made me realise something. the demographic of the anti a certain party-ers = 24 to 30 years old and highly educated. exactly the kind of people a certain party wants and that the fact these detractors are shooting a certain party for only roping in that kind. hmmm. ironic? you betcha!

i mean c’mon, take a good look at me. i’m not exactly the kind of person that most political parties would be dying to rope in. in fact, i am what they would term as ‘the ordinary folk’, which oh, coincidentally, happens to be the folk who decide who gets to be the ruling party! if i can bring myself to see what a certain party has been doing for us for the past 40 odd years, i think those seemingly intelligent panelists(who by the way are having some kind of retort show hosted by diana ser today. and like DOH, they obviously still think they were right to be rude to MM Lee) should be able to see some light. provided they want to, i guess.

 you know ah, they behaving like they are politically disenfranchised. wait until that happens. who’ll start crying first huh?

my older sister(who is in the demographic i mentioned earlier) says that she didn’t find those people were being rude to MM Lee. so i asked my younger sister who’s 16(and extremely opinionated) if she thought that the panelists were being reasonable in their mannerisms and speech. she said she didn’t approve. my older sis has once said she was like me, but her thinking has unfortunately morphed(i’m not insulting my sis, she’s just representative of the mold those panelists are shaped from). so now i’m wondering if my younger sis will follow suit.

in any case, i’ll still stick by to my beliefs. besides i don’t see the other parties focusing on really fantastic stuff anyway. they seem to be harping on the narrow scope of negativity and to me, that isn’t much at all.

SDP : www.singaporedemocrat.org

WP : www.wp.org.sg

PAP : www.pap.org.sg

lilien + aunties + swing girls

Wednesday, April 27th, 2005

Swing Girls!
went to watch together with chin,chanwei and jon sim. the movie was awesome. it was funny and inspiring, kinda. except that it was amazing(as usual) how fast the characters could pick up playing the instruments so fast. i recommend it to anybody who loves a good team-spirit movie!

on the way to somerset..the train was kinda packed towards the lavender-bugis area. this aunty in an orange blouse came on the train…and was super rude i tell you. it was already so squeezy, yet she insisted on busting her way in and grabbed onto chin’s hair for support. although i feel bad chin got affected by that woman, i’m half glad it wasn’t me because i certainly would have let that aunty know what i was thinking immeadiately.

at cathay, since chin was craving for XXL chicken we went to buy it. first the queue was long, secondly there were only 2 people manning the counter, thirdly…

there were 3 teenage boys behind us yet they got served first. the aunty in the store assumed that they were friends of ours. excuse me arh, but i don’t hang out with little boys that lie to get their food first! of course we were late for the movie thanks to that chicken aunty. the poor guy assisting her didn’t really know about it until i got super fed up. i said in chinese “we were here first, we were not with them! why did you give them first?”. and yes, my tone showed how mad i was. the best part? the aunty explained to her assistant in dialect she thought that when chin and i said ‘3 packets’ it was for me, chin, and those 3 boys -_-” from her expression, i gather it is safe to conclude that she assumes that neither chin nor i understood dialect.

really felt like shouting at that woman for her disregard for good customer service standards. good thing her assistant was suitably apologetic. otherwise…

i suppose i’m very demanding as a customer. after all i have been at the other side of customer relations as a promoter and when working in the hospital for attachment. i know what it is like to serve and be served. therefore i cannot tolerate service that is half-hearted and waaay below par. sigh. need to be more patient. but those aunties really made me so angry.

after the movie we first went to coffee club outside california fitness coz jon sim hadn’t eaten yet. but since we were practically the youngest there, the staff indirectly snubbed us and we didn’t get seats even after waiting for 15 min. so we left and went to nydc. well at least the service was prompt enough.

went back by van!!! ahaha. eleta’s friend daniel happened to be in town with jon tay & his brother for their friend’s bday party. so we got a free ride home! ahaha. felt quite paiseh coz it was the 1st time i met daniel and i was practically sponging off a free ride from him. it wouldn’t have been that bad if it was the 2nd time i met him but he was pretty nice. yup. but it was a sad day for me in the end because i dropped my rubber bands which i just bought in his van =\

i think i’ll go to the library tommorow. i need some mental stimulation.

my blogger account is SCREWED

Sunday, October 31st, 2004

even though i’ve been posting up more entries the total number that’s recorded on my account never seems to exceed 35. bugger.

oh yeah. new feature. my very own Guest Book.its at da right column. please write nice things. and even if you slam me, i know who you are. and if you try to run, i will hunt you down.

yays i’ve only got like 3 more papers to go,the most horrible one tmr (bioscience).after wednesday i’ll really be looking forward to : post-exams celebrations and yeah, it includes going to the zoo for bday celebrations,watching movies,shopping,going ChiangMai and Bangkok and perhaps going for YA retreat though i’m like super reluctant to go.

today when i went to parkway to eat, i saw a woman shouting at a man in hokkien. when i looked closely, i saw that she had removed one of her slippers and was holding it in a rather aggressive stance. i thought she was having a domestic quarrel with the man. but as it turns out she was whacking her daughter earlier with the slipper in public, so the man interfered out of concern (i mean who will stand there and watch a crazynutcase whacks their kid in public with a dirty slipper?). the woman was shouting “it’s none of your business how i discipline my daughter! don’t be so inquisitive and poke your nose into my business!” geez. this woman needs to go IMH. the police can arrest her for abusing the poor girl. but yeah, its not my problem exactly. i can just imagine the scenario when the girl gets back.

[mother approaches with weapon of choice and starts beating the daughter]
“see lah! what happened because you [insert misbehaviour] ! i was so embarassed! and that man so nice to you! don’t let me beat you!”
[father tries to stop his crazy wife]
“don’t hit her, she’s only a little girl”
[crazy nut pushes father away]
“you shut up! you can’t even discipline your stupid daughter properly, so i do it for you lah!”
[girl snatches weapon from mother and knocks her out with it]
“good job!”
[father and daughter hi-5 each other, leave the nutcase alone and go out for a meal]

i wish.
okay, gotta go back to my ’studying’.

urgh

Friday, September 24th, 2004

now i know why i desisted putting up a comments function on this blog. so that i can speak my mind without fear of flaming. mwahaha.


Grace Chua, the newest perfect 10 dj said this in a LIME interview.
LIME :How did you acquire your American accent?
GC : I don’t know if you’ll believe this or not but this is a true story! My mum’s Japanese so when my sister and I were kids, she wanted to make sure that we could speak English very well. So she made us watch lots of angmo shows like Sesame Street and Electric Company. We’d copy the way they speak and say it to each other. Honestly, that’s how I got to speaking like this.

THAT IS TOTAL CRAP LOR. i also grew up watching lots of western kiddy shows what. that’s how i got to learn stuff like the alphabet,singing kiddy songs and adoring puppets like elmo,bert and etc. but yeah, my family is still 100% born and bred in Singapore, so i still speak like a true blue Singaporean though i am able to speak without singlish at ease(whenever i want to,that is). and since most singaporeans are used to infusing singlish into their everyday vocab, the omitting of singlish makes them assume that the person is not from singapore. i was laughing like nobody’s business in the bus as i was reading the interview. it was so like, poser lor. at least Otelli Edwards can credit her speaking style to her heritage, coz like she’s sure to be around native eng speakers. but Chua has a jap mom and a chinese dad. there’s no way she could’ve picked up the angmoh accent unless one of them was an ABC.

my verdict : Grace Chua is a poser. i didn’t even have to infer. she practically spat it out.

freaking irritated and impersonated.

Tuesday, August 31st, 2004

i actually didnt wanna blog coz i had to devote some time to the wonderful joys of studying.

but nooo…someone had to come ruin my day.won’t say who because i have my reasons yeah. someone actually had the time to assume my identity online. sent msgs too on my behalf.making me look as though i am some pathetic loser with lots of time and crappy ideas to embarass myself online. crap. next time i’m never going to post blogs/msgs which are potentially “sabo-sensitive” up lest i get malu-ated again. geez. its not as though i’m some popular girl who owns half of the population yah. in fact i prefer to be low-profile without anybody new and unecessarily getting to know who i am. i like making new friends,but i never go all out to do so.neither would i annouce that “OH I MADE A NEW FRIEND AND I’M SO DAMN HAPPY ONE MORE IDIOT TO WORSHIP ME ME ME ME ME”

oh yeah one more thing. you realise i almost never put up *starred words* unless i just want to annoy someone online which isn’t very often? most of you know i find *starring words* very girly.it just isn’t me.*so crappy* imagine if the next para is really written by me.

toDaY, mii sAw a cUtE dOctOr wOrx! *smilez* hE sO taLL n HaNdSomE! jUz liKe tAyPinGhUi(eeeks in real life i don’t like actors).dEn RiTE, i gOt tO asSisT hiM lEy! hahaX i So LuCky riTe! mii FrEnX veRi jEaLoUs *LoLx* bUt hOr mii NoT uSeD tO stAnDinG fEr LoNg hOurs..fEet PaiN..*sighx* miZz my DaRhs whU aLwiZ huGs Mii and maKe mii feEL aLL bEttEr =\ bUT nVm loRx mii CaN alwiZ sEe tAt HanDsOmE dOctoR! *heEz*

i may be rubbish at the english language but i won’t stoop that low. i won’t insult it that way. and my fingers hurt from trying to type cutesy style. sheesh.

my new 3 words : Feminist,Protagonist,Nationalist.

oh a piece of better news : i got shortlisted by CGH after my interview. i liked my interviewer,one of the As.Director of nursing. wells now my sponsorship ‘fate’ lies in the hands of the ‘higher beings’ in CGH HR. but as i mentioned before, i rather leave it to God instead of worrying.He gives and takes. all for my own good anyhow.its His way and not mine. =)

sue a perfect 10

Friday, August 13th, 2004

Raver Bear
Raver Bear

Which Dysfunctional Care Bear Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla

sheikh haikel’s been fired.

daniel ong has been suspended from on-air duties.

all because of a remark made in jest that was perceived by a “concerned member of the public” to be rude,lewd and intrusive. personally i feel that the remark was a little OTT but it didn’t warrant firing SH and suspending DO. i mean come on lah. SH is a family man and DO is a nerd personified. do they look like sick perverts to you?

remember a steven lim that i quoted in my blog sometime back? apparently he was a nutcase back in NYP. some sort of an exhibitionist in StageArts.ewwww.

yay!

Thursday, August 5th, 2004

updates on the boring life of Lilien =D

i cut my hair! its the shortest its ever been in about 3 years! and it cost $4!
i got my new uniform!
i will be doing attachment at marine parade polyclinic and CGH.
i keep on hearing “the reason” everywhere.
i want a debit card so i can get free tix to the Hoobastank Concert.
infact, since i will be working this sunday, i’m going to use the cash to watch them if possible.

*** the most important update however…
there has been this girl in my class who has been bitching about me in class. she told the whole class i’m freaking arrogant and a snob. and you know what? last year, there was also a girl in my class who spread exactly the same kind of bitching around about me! gee…i wonder what did i do to them to make them detest me so much. however i shall not be bothered by this year’s girl because last year’s girl paid the price for spreading rumours about me all too soon. hmmmph.